https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30703
--- Comment #4 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3)
> So the next question is - are you asking that commit 8bb23cdbb498 be
> reverted, so that the docs will build with older versions of texinfo,
> or that the t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24458
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
commit 646657284f6b62a71a6869826e951b3def4d73a6 (upstream/master)
Author: Sam James
Date: Wed Aug 16 07:21:53 2023 +0100
ld: ld-lib.exp: log failed dump.out contents for debugging
If we're using
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.42
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768
--- Comment #2 from xiezhiheng ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> I have
>
> have-protected-data = no
>
> in config.make. What do you have?
In my config.make, have-protected-data = yes
Oh I think I find something interesting. Tha
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
I'm guessing that it is the use of opcodes cgen headers in gdb itself that is
triggering these warnings, not the use of those headers in opcodes. I think
I'd be looking at gdb/mep-tdep.c and gdb/or1k-tdep.c,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 15069
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15069&action=edit
CONFIGURELOG.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
Hi Sam,
> Created attachment 15066 [details]
> 0001-ld-ld-lib.exp-log-failed-dump.out-contents-for-debug.patch
That patch is approved - please apply.
> 2) Figurin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 15070
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15070&action=edit
MAKELOG.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> Hi Tom,
>
> How are you configuring and building the sources when you encounter
> this error ?
>
Like so:
...
$ cat build.sh
#!/bin/sh
pwd=$(pwd -P)
sr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30703
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Jan,
Right, after downloading, building, installing and running lots of
different versions of texinfo, I can confirm that support for the
node style used by commit 8bb23cdbb498 was added with rele
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28231
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbeulich at suse dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756
Adam Majer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ld: |ld:
|-Wl,-z,pack-relat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756
--- Comment #6 from Adam Majer ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
> comment 3 makes it sound like -Wl,--no-keep-memory actually breaks it. We
> had some problems in the past with this combination, like PR29939..
This is exactly true.
18 matches
Mail list logo
