https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756
--- Comment #6 from Adam Majer <amajer at suse dot de> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > comment 3 makes it sound like -Wl,--no-keep-memory actually breaks it. We > had some problems in the past with this combination, like PR29939.. This is exactly true. Here's a table for quick reference. -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs -Wl,--no-keep-memory == OOM, past 4GB -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs == OK, about 2GB usage -Wl,--no-keep-memory == OK, about similar, maybe little less Other options seem to have no significant effect on memory consumption -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
