https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
--- Comment #7 from maamountki ---
Thinking of replacing the new layout with this one
+--+
|.got[0]: DYNAMIC | <--- _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ .got
+-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
--- Comment #6 from maamountki ---
(In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #5)
> One difference to the ld implementation is that you appear to always use the
> new got layout. ld uses the new layout only for partial relro to keep impact
> on
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24455
--- Comment #2 from Liviu Ionescu ---
a quick attempt to produce a small hello world binary that can demonstrate the
problem failed; I'll retry on a large production binary.
> I assume that the patched file does work if it is not
> stripped
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24493
--- Comment #3 from Eli Zaretskii ---
Thanks, will do.
Just so I understand: do you want me to build GDB with this change or Binutils?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24493
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at sourceware dot org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to maamountki from comment #4)
Looks good to me. However, I'm not a Gold maintainer.
One difference to the ld implementation is that you appear to always use the
new got layout. ld uses the ne
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24493
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
