https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
--- Comment #6 from maamountki <maamountk at hotmail dot com> --- (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #5) > One difference to the ld implementation is that you appear to always use the > new got layout. ld uses the new layout only for partial relro to keep impact > on existing stuff as small as possible. Unfortunately gold does not provide the flexibility that ld offer, You can see the same behavior on the other platforms. > Have you checked that all this works with linker scripts as well. I mean > linker scripts which have got and got.plt swapped? Will gold do the right > thing for these variants with regard to the 3 magic entries, > _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, and DT_PLTGOT? Yes I do and it does not. .got and .got.plt must be set properly in linker srcript to get it work otherwise a segmentation fault will be produced. I can see the same behavior on different platform "x86_64". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
