https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22419
Bug ID: 22419
Summary: binary format generated by LD is incorrect
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uros Bizjak from comment #13)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
>
> > Someone bothered enough to open a bug report with a testcase. That is
> > good enough for me.
>
> gcc generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> Someone bothered enough to open a bug report with a testcase. That is
> good enough for me.
gcc generated non-sensical output in -asm=intel mode, and assembler fa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #11)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> > > > In the case of "fs:gs:[eax]", you can replace it with
> > > > "fs:[eax]" to get the same output.
> > >
> > > In strai
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #11 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> > > In the case of "fs:gs:[eax]", you can replace it with
> > > "fs:[eax]" to get the same output.
> >
> > In straight line code yes. But what if a first override i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #9)
>
> > It is more important for gas to be consistent with itself.
>
> That's a bogus goal imo: Different assembly syntax can naturally result in
Not to me.
> apparen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #9 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #7)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > > If gas doesn't allow multiple segment registers in AT&T syntax, it
> > > shou
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > If gas doesn't allow multiple segment registers in AT&T syntax, it
> > shouldn't allow them in Intel syntax.
>
> I can only
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #7 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> If gas doesn't allow multiple segment registers in AT&T syntax, it
> shouldn't allow them in Intel syntax.
I can only keep telling you that I view maximum possible co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #4)
> The adjustment done to intelok.s is was wrong here: MASM accepts that code,
> and so should gas. I certainly can agree that accepting _anything_ between
> the colons w
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #5 from Jan Beulich ---
(I can't, btw, see how to change the status of the bug back from RESOLVED
FIXED, or how to re-assign it. Pretty strange a UI limitation as it seems.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbeulich at novell dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22416
Bug ID: 22416
Summary: heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl16
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutil
13 matches
Mail list logo
