https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #4) > The adjustment done to intelok.s is was wrong here: MASM accepts that code, > and so should gas. I certainly can agree that accepting _anything_ between > the colons was too lax, but the change has definitely introduced a > regression. Please fix, and for future Intel syntax changes please also > follow the fundamental model of awaiting maintainer approval. If gas doesn't allow multiple segment registers in AT&T syntax, it shouldn't allow them in Intel syntax. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
