https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19818
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4933
gusfl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gusfl at free dot fr
Severity|normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4356
gusfl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16635
--- Comment #2 from Maarten Brock ---
Sorry for the late reply. I think I missed the previous one.
I was actually asking for a CRC, but an MD5 or SHA1 could do as well.
But what I miss is where I can find this ID in the binary image. Or how
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19539
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3ab94f96a99e88c5cb6d5acd34bd0a35ba6f376a
commit 3ab94f96a99e88c5cb6d5acd34bd0a35
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19818
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
More tests
[hjl@gnu-skl-1 tmp]$ cat foo.c
#include
extern char foo;
void *p = &foo;
int
main ()
{
printf ("%p\n", p);
printf ("%p\n", &foo);
return 0;
}
[hjl@gnu-skl-1 tmp]$ gcc -fPIE foo.c -c
[hjl@
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19818
Bug ID: 19818
Summary: Absolute symbol is handled incorrectly in PIE
Product: binutils
Version: 2.27 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Componen