https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
--- Comment #6 from Cary Coutant ---
>> I should qualify that by saying it "works" in the sense that I see an
>> absolute R_X86_64_64 relocation instead of RELATIVE, but it ought to have
>> the same effect.
>
> That would still be a problem if
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
--- Comment #5 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola ---
> > > Produces a R_X86_64_RELATIVE. Unfortunately that doesn't work with bfd.
> >
> > It works in my experiments.
>
> I should qualify that by saying it "works" in the sense that I see an
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
--- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #3)
> (In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola from comment #1)
> > The issue in gold can be avoided by making the declaration hidden:
> >
> > .section bar, "a"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
--- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant ---
(In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola from comment #1)
> The issue in gold can be avoided by making the declaration hidden:
>
> .section bar, "a"
> .hidden __start_bar
> .quad __st
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19145
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Roelofs ---
Unfortunately, that doesn't fix it.
My gcc and binutils configurations are described here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871#c3
I've attached the object file that I get from compiling
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19145
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Roelofs ---
Created attachment 8727
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8727&action=edit
object file compiled from empty source file
$ rm empty.c
$ touch empty.c
$ ./install/bin/arm-none-eabi-g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19145
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Pl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19145
Jonathan Roelofs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19145
Bug ID: 19145
Summary: [regression] arm-none-eabi big-endian LTO broken
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
--- Comment #1 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola ---
The issue in gold can be avoided by making the declaration hidden:
.section bar, "a"
.hidden __start_bar
.quad __start_bar
Produces a R_X86_64_RELATIVE. Unfortunately
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4933
Evgeniy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19119
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19119
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6457197210144f50a696097c0d308d81d46d5510
commit 6457197210144f50a696097c0d308d81
14 matches
Mail list logo