https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
--- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #3) > (In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola from comment #1) > > The issue in gold can be avoided by making the declaration hidden: > > > > .section bar, "a" > > .hidden __start_bar > > .quad __start_bar > > > > Produces a R_X86_64_RELATIVE. Unfortunately that doesn't work with bfd. > > It works in my experiments. I should qualify that by saying it "works" in the sense that I see an absolute R_X86_64_64 relocation instead of RELATIVE, but it ought to have the same effect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils