https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
Change assembler may break existing code. I think gold should
behave the same as ld on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #12 from Cary Coutant ---
> The documentation can have some improvements. But ld.bfd behavior is
> well-defined as shown by testcases in ld/testsuite/ld-elfvers.
If you're going to maintain that ".symver foo,foo@VER" is valid, th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18521
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Depends on|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18663
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||18521
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18628
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||18521
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18521
--- Comment #5 from Cary Coutant ---
Sigh. This bug isn't really a duplicate of PR 18628 (it's really 18268 that
duplicates a subset of this one). Let's consider this bug split into PR 18628
(for the IFUNC failures) and PR 18863 (for the scrip
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18663
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
A patc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18663
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18628
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
This b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18628
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com
--- Comm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18521
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18628
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18663
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18521
--- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant ---
*** Bug 18663 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18521
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18628
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #10)
>
> In this example, "foo" is both unversioned and versioned. In response
> to the unversioned one, gold is creating a default version, as
> directed by the linker s
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #10 from Cary Coutant ---
>> T foo
>> T foo@VERS_1.1
>>
>> With the version script, gold sees the first of those (plain "foo")
>> and makes it the default version (as, I think, it should). The seco
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sriraman Tallam from comment #8)
>
> From your later comments, it does look like the difference is because
> of the extra "@" added by gold to make it the default symbol.
>
Linker shouldn't add t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #8 from Sriraman Tallam ---
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:07 PM, ccoutant at gmail dot com
wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
>
> --- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant ---
> Sorry, I need more context than that
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #6)
> >Another usage of the '.symver' directive is:
> > .symver NAME, NAME2@@NODENAME
> >In this case, the symbol NAME must exist and be defined within the
> >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #6 from Cary Coutant ---
>Another usage of the '.symver' directive is:
> .symver NAME, NAME2@@NODENAME
>In this case, the symbol NAME must exist and be defined within the
> file being assembled. It is similar to NAME2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
>From "info ld":
To do this, you must use multiple '.symver' directives in the source
file. Here is an example:
__asm__(".symver original_foo,foo@");
__asm__(".symver old_foo,foo@VERS_1.1");
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #1)
> I think this is working as intended, although comparing with Gnu ld output,
> I see that gold defines it as a default version ("@@") where Gnu ld does
> not. I'm not
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant ---
Sorry, I need more context than that. You've said that the symbol is
not versioned, but in fact it is. The only differences between the two
linkers that I see are:
(1) The name that appears in the linker s
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #2 from Sriraman Tallam ---
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:03 AM, ccoutant at gmail dot com
wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
>
> --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant ---
> You're looking at the linker symbol
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
--- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant ---
You're looking at the linker symbol table with nm. (And nm does not show
versioning information from the .gnu.version* sections.)
When I build this with gold, readelf -Vs shows:
Symbol table '.dynsym' con
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
Sriraman Tallam changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com
--
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18548
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18548
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5417c94d1a944d1a27f99240e5d62a6d7cd324f1
commit 5417c94d1a944d1a27f99240e5d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
Sriraman Tallam changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703
Bug ID: 18703
Summary: Symbol version and Version script incompatibility with
BFD ld
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b8c6c5ef99ef8f07fcea1c777d5084dc6f7232e5
commit b8c6c5ef99ef8f07fcea1c777d5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot co |ccoutant at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Senkevich ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #1)
...
> or print a warning that the -e option should
> be used when there is no startup file.
But it could be some incremental linking. And, for example, ld.bfd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|ccouta
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
41 matches
Mail list logo
