[Bug gas/13572] New: x86-32: Assembler does not accept "QWORD PTR" for "cvttps2pi" instruction

2012-01-06 Thread m...@mythic-beasts.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13572 Bug #: 13572 Summary: x86-32: Assembler does not accept "QWORD PTR" for "cvttps2pi" instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity:

[Bug binutils/13571] New: objdump incorrectly disassembles 'movnti' as using 'QWORD PTR'

2012-01-06 Thread m...@mythic-beasts.com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13571 Bug #: 13571 Summary: objdump incorrectly disassembles 'movnti' as using 'QWORD PTR' Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/13569] New: Linker garbage collection retains debug information which leads to GDB bus errors

2012-01-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13569 Bug #: 13569 Summary: Linker garbage collection retains debug information which leads to GDB bus errors Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Se

[Bug binutils/13121] bfd HEAD 2011-08-23 does not build on AIX 5.3 without --enable-werror=no

2012-01-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13121 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug binutils/13121] bfd HEAD 2011-08-23 does not build on AIX 5.3 without --enable-werror=no

2012-01-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13121 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 15:44:44 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2012-01-06 15:44:34 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog reloc.c Log mess

[Bug binutils/13121] bfd HEAD 2011-08-23 does not build on AIX 5.3 without --enable-werror=no

2012-01-06 Thread sms at antinode dot info
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13121 --- Comment #5 from Steven Schweda 2012-01-06 13:42:11 UTC --- > Are you sure [...] Pretty sure, plus the other stuff described elsewhere: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13558 If I ran the world (and cared about AIX),

[Bug binutils/13560] DWARF2 .debug_info section not found if placed after .debug_line and .debug_abbrev sections

2012-01-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13560 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/13121] bfd HEAD 2011-08-23 does not build on AIX 5.3 without --enable-werror=no

2012-01-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13121 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug binutils/13548] C++ Filt Overflow

2012-01-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13548 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/13561] AIX link failure: RLD address not contained in section

2012-01-06 Thread ka5427-536 at online dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Georg Thien 2012-01-06 10:33:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:37 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote: > > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 > > > > --- Comment #3 from

[Bug ld/13561] AIX link failure: RLD address not contained in section

2012-01-06 Thread gingold at adacore dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 --- Comment #4 from gingold at adacore dot com 2012-01-06 09:18:31 UTC --- On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:37 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 > > --- Comment #3 from ka5427-536 at online dot

Re: [Bug ld/13561] AIX link failure: RLD address not contained in section

2012-01-06 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:37 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 > > --- Comment #3 from ka5427-536 at online dot de 2012-01-05 08:37:27 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #2) >> On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote: >> >