http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12974
--- Comment #3 from Jon Grant 2011-07-31 22:51:23 UTC ---
Hi Nick
Thank you for your update with anyalysis and also the patch.
Unfortunately I don't have time to test the patch as I'm overloaded currently.
Perhaps the change can simply be com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
Summary: Invalid address for x32
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redh
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-31 21:14:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > You have "call b_print_newline" where b_print_newline is 0x100040
> > and you get "callq *0x100040". What is wrong with that? Please
> > tell me why you thi
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046
--- Comment #2 from wayo.cavazos at gmail dot com 2011-07-31 19:58:18 UTC ---
> You have "call b_print_newline" where b_print_newline is 0x100040
> and you get "callq *0x100040". What is wrong with that? Please
> tell me why you think binutis
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fr