[Bug gas/13046] Calling equ'd symbols

2011-07-31 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug ld/12974] ld "undefined reference" shows wrong line number

2011-07-31 Thread jg at jguk dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12974 --- Comment #3 from Jon Grant 2011-07-31 22:51:23 UTC --- Hi Nick Thank you for your update with anyalysis and also the patch. Unfortunately I don't have time to test the patch as I'm overloaded currently. Perhaps the change can simply be com

[Bug ld/13048] New: Invalid address for x32

2011-07-31 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13048 Summary: Invalid address for x32 Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redh

[Bug gas/13046] Calling equ'd symbols

2011-07-31 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-31 21:14:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > > You have "call b_print_newline" where b_print_newline is 0x100040 > > and you get "callq *0x100040". What is wrong with that? Please > > tell me why you thi

[Bug gas/13046] Calling equ'd symbols

2011-07-31 Thread wayo.cavazos at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046 --- Comment #2 from wayo.cavazos at gmail dot com 2011-07-31 19:58:18 UTC --- > You have "call b_print_newline" where b_print_newline is 0x100040 > and you get "callq *0x100040". What is wrong with that? Please > tell me why you think binutis

[Bug gas/13046] Calling equ'd symbols

2011-07-31 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 fr