http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13046
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-07-31 19:47:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
>
> Here's a GAS version:
>
> .set b_print_newline , 0x0000000000100040
>
> .text
>
> .global _start
>
> _start:
>
> call b_print_newline
>
> ret
>
> Assemble and link it:
>
> $ as -o pr-nl-b.o pr-nl-b.s
> $ ld -Ttext 200000 --oformat binary -o pr-nl-b.app pr-nl-b.o
>
> Disassemble it:
>
> $ objdump -D -b binary -m i386:x86-64 pr-nl-b.app
> pr-nl-b.app: file format binary
>
>
> Disassembly of section .data:
>
> 0000000000000000 <.data>:
> 0: ff 14 25 40 00 10 00 callq *0x100040
> 7: c3 retq
>
You have "call b_print_newline" where b_print_newline is 0x100040
and you get "callq *0x100040". What is wrong with that? Please
tell me why you think binutis is wrong. Please don't mention NASM
here since I can say NASM is wrong.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
