[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-09-14 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-15 05:37 --- I have built binutils including the patch linked in the previous comment. I confirm it fixes all the problem we currently have wrt this issue. Thanks. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-09-14 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-14 23:53 --- Thanks a lot for your work. I'll test it tomorrow on a few of the cases we have and keep you updated. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144 --- You are receiving this mail because: -

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-09-14 Thread macro at linux-mips dot org
--- Additional Comments From macro at linux-mips dot org 2010-09-14 23:38 --- Aurelien, I have posted my proposal now, including LD testsuite cases: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-09/msg00216.html Maciej -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144 --- Y

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-09-14 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-14 23:01 --- Thanks for working on that. I have also spend some time trying to understand the problem. I have also written a patch by analysing the difference with other architecture, so I am not really sure it is correct

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-09-14 Thread macro at linux-mips dot org
--- Additional Comments From macro at linux-mips dot org 2010-09-14 21:16 --- Aurelien, Coincidentally, I've been working on this problem for the last couple of days. I believe I have a fix ready that I plan to submit once it's gone through testing; probably even tonight. BTW, it's

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-09-14 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-14 19:24 --- Created an attachment (id=4981) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4981&action=view) Testcase with C code and makefile This new testcase doesn't obsolete the previous ones, but it's probabl

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-09-14 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-14 19:17 --- I am reopening the bug as it appeared that the issue is not fixed in GCC 4.5 as I wrongly said here. It's just that our gcc was configured to default to -mplt which, in some cases, workaround the issue. To s

[Bug gprof/12020] New: gprof time accumulation problem in win32

2010-09-14 Thread jponteprino at gmail dot com
In win32 gprof don't perform accumulation on execution time or report is bad. This works in binutils 2.17. -- Summary: gprof time accumulation problem in win32 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: critical P

[Bug ld/12017] New: Would like to disable compiler warning re use of tmpnam

2010-09-14 Thread om dot p dot sachan at intel dot com
When building code that calls tmpnam, the compiler generates this warning: "warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'" Unlike other compiler warnings this one does not have a number and so there appears to be no way to disable it. I'd really like to disable this warning as