------- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-14 23:01
-------
Thanks for working on that. I have also spend some time trying to understand
the problem. I have also written a patch by analysing the difference with other
architecture, so I am not really sure it is correct:
--- a/elfxx-mips.c
+++ b/elfxx-mips.c
@@ -8341,6 +8339,11 @@ _bfd_mips_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol (str
if (h->def_regular)
return TRUE;
+ /* If there are no references to this symbol that do not use the
+ GOT, we don't need to generate a copy reloc. */
+ if (!h->non_got_ref)
+ return TRUE;
+
/* There's also nothing more to do if we'll convert all relocations
against this symbol into dynamic relocations. */
if (!hmips->has_static_relocs)
At least it fixes the issue.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
