[Bug binutils/10478] "File format not recognized" for some solaris libraries

2009-09-08 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2009-09-09 03:16 --- If SHF_LINK_ORDER is set in the flags field, then the sh_link field is permitted to contain the special values SHN_BEFORE (65280) and SHN_AFTER (65281). SHN_BEFORE means that this section should come before all other s

[Bug binutils/10428] --with-sysroot configure option is undocumented

2009-09-08 Thread pi00100100 at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pi00100100 at gmail dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10428 --- You are receiving th

[Bug binutils/10478] "File format not recognized" for some solaris libraries

2009-09-08 Thread niki dot waibel at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-08 14:50 --- the following files can't be used by binutils: === find /usr/sfw/lib /usr/lib -type f | grep "\.so\." | while read i; do size $i 1>/dev/null 2>&1 || echo $i; done /usr/sfw/lib/libMagick++.so.5.0.47 /usr/sfw/

[Bug binutils/10478] "File format not recognized" for some solaris libraries

2009-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-09-08 13:49 --- Hi Niki, > is this going to be fixed in binutils? If you can find an explanation for the why the .exception_ranges section has an invalid sh_link value of 65280 then we will fix the binutils. But at the moment

[Bug binutils/10478] "File format not recognized" for some solaris libraries

2009-09-08 Thread niki dot waibel at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-09-08 12:53 --- is this going to be fixed in binutils? it is definitely a big impact on solaris, as some programs just do not compile (using gcc/binutils). libC.so.5 is just one example of such a library. -- http://sour