[Bug gas/2512] movsd in intel syntax mode

2006-04-04 Thread bje at sources dot redhat dot com
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au http://sourceware.org/bugzil

[Bug gas/2512] New: movsd in intel syntax mode

2006-04-04 Thread jadevree at mtu dot edu
In intel syntax mode the following instruction fails: movsd QWORD PTR [%esp], %xmm0 test.s: Assembler messages: test.s:23: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movsd' If I write up the same code in AT&T syntax and decompile it with objdump to intel syntax I get the instruction out in the form

[Bug binutils/149] configure incorrectly assumes presence of gettext implies presence of msgfmt

2006-04-04 Thread dave dot korn at artimi dot com
--- Additional Comments From dave dot korn at artimi dot com 2006-04-04 09:32 --- Hi Ben, I see you just accepted this old thing! To add some detail that I've found out since, cygwin packages msgfmt with the readline-devel package, gettext ships in the readline (i.e runtimes-onl

[Bug gas/997] invalid error messages, and internal error abort

2006-04-04 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-04-04 08:06 --- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-04/msg00013.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/998] generates non-optimal instruction...

2006-04-04 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- Bug 998 depends on bug 997, which changed state. Bug 997 Summary: invalid error messages, and internal error abort http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=997 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug gas/998] generates non-optimal instruction...

2006-04-04 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-04-04 08:05 --- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-04/msg00013.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/2335] gprof reads executable 10x slower on opteron/x86_64

2006-04-04 Thread dirkjan at magma-da dot com
--- Additional Comments From dirkjan at magma-da dot com 2006-04-04 07:05 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can you attach some example binaries, please? It does not make sense that > x86-64 binaries produced by a modern version of GCC would produce stabs > debugging info. I suspect your