--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-02
23:21 ---
It's a TLS relocation, not supported on SPARC 64-bit in any released version.
You need to use CVS mainline or a recent 2.17 snapshot.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
Attempting to build the current Glibc snapshot on a Sparc64 system. Receive the
following error.
/mnt/netra/cross-tools/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
/mnt/netra/build/glibc-cross-64bit/libc_pic.os: check_relocs: unhandled reloc
type 67
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-02 15:03 ---
It doesn't segfault:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rel-2]$
/export/build/gnu/binutils-import/build-x86_64-linux/ld/ld-new -r fail.o
/export/build/gnu/binutils-import/build-x86_64-linux/ld/ld-new: error: fail.o
contains a reloc (0
The content of p_paddr in ELF progam header isn't specified. It is OK to
put anything in p_paddr. But it is certainly not OK to interpret it for
anything like what copy_private_bfd_data in elf.c does.
--
Summary: p_paddr in ELF progam header isn't handled properly
Product: b
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2097
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-02 15:10 ---
It looks like c3640-is-mz.120-28a.bin is corrupted. Can you upload it?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2257
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From alec at sensi dot org 2006-02-02 14:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=857)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=857&action=view)
ELF
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1129
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From alec at sensi dot org 2006-02-02 14:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=858)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=858&action=view)
asm
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1129
--- You are receiving this mail because: