--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-11
02:57 ---
Closing per comment #26.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-11 02:55 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> You need to find out why those symbols aren't defined, given that
I just found the problem. It was an installation of an o
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-11 02:49 ---
You need to find out why those symbols aren't defined, given that
ld.so.1 is loaded via DT_NEEDED in libc.so.6. I saw a few possibilities:
1. A bfd/ld bug which is platform dependent.
2. Different binutils sources.
3.
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-11 00:31 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> I can't duplicate your problem:
I was afraid of that. As I indicated originally, the problem seemed
start file sensitive.
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 22:45 ---
I can't duplicate your problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hppa-3]$ make
./ld -o main --eh-frame-hdr -dynamic-linker /lib/ld.so.1 \
crt1.o crti.o crtbegin.o main.o -lgcc --as-needed \
-lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:53 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:41:08PM -, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot o
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 21:41 ---
I also need /usr/lib/crti.o.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
__
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:33 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:17:12PM -, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot o
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 21:17 ---
I also need /usr/lib/libc.so and the related files. Please do
# cat /usr/lib/libc.so
to see what they are.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:09 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 05:03:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > Please provide all input files for me to reproduce it w
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:03 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Please provide all input files for me to reproduce it with a cross linker.
Attached.
Dave
--- Additional Comments Fro
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 20:43 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> This shouldn't be a problem since executable doesn't use any symbols in ld.so.
> If you can provide a testcase, I will try t
actually none of these bug reports are out of context.
i have an assembler file with every instruction in the intel docs
(we need a comprehensive test case) and
i'm just reporting the actual output from objdump.
perhaps it's a version issue. which version are you using?
if all else fails i can sen
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 20:30 ---
Please provide all input files for me to reproduce it with a cross linker.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 20:28 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> It looks OK. A testcase is needed.
The following C file triggers the problem:
int main () { return 0; }
The link command
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 20:22 ---
It looks OK. A testcase is needed.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 04:01:10PM -0400, root wrote:
> actually none of these bug reports are out of context.
> i have an assembler file with every instruction in the intel docs
> (we need a comprehensive test case) and
> i'm just reporting the actual output from objdump.
>
> perhaps it's a versi
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 19:59 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Can you show me your "readelf -d /lib/libc.so.6":
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/binutils-2.16.91/src/bfd$ readelf -d /lib/libc.so.6|l
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 19:46 ---
Can you show me your "readelf -d /lib/libc.so.6":
[EMAIL PROTECTED] glibc-nptl-4.0]$ readelf -d /lib/libc.so.6
Dynamic section at offset 0x126cfc contains 26 entries:
TagType Name/Va
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:13:12PM -0400, root wrote:
>
> mwait ; 0F 01 C9
>
> generates:
>
> 0f sidt (bad)
> 01 c9 add ecx,ecx
>
>
> (ref: p3-556 IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual
> Vol 2A: Instruction Set Referen
mwait ; 0F 01 C9
generates:
0f sidt (bad)
01 c9 add ecx,ecx
(ref: p3-556 IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual
Vol 2A: Instruction Set Reference, A-M Order Number 253666)
Tim Daly
___
pause ; F3 90
generates:
f3 90 repz nop
(ref: p4-40 IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual
Vol 2B: Instruction Set Reference, N-Z Order Number 253667)
Tim Daly
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-bi
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 19:21 ---
This shouldn't be a problem since executable doesn't use any symbols in ld.so.
If you can provide a testcase, I will try to look into it.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
--- You are rece
movddup xmm1,xmm2 ; F2 0F 12 CA
generates:
f2 0f 12 ca repnz movhlps xmm1,xmm2
(ref: p3-490 IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual
Vol 2A: Instruction Set Reference, A-M Order Number 253666)
Tim Daly
___
bug-bin
monitor; 0F 01 C8
generates:
0f sidt (bad)
01 c8add eax,ecx
Tim Daly
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-10
19:01 ---
I should add that these dynamic symbols are references to global objects:
200: 4 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT UND [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1
4)
848: 168 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT UND [EMAIL
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 18:43 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolut
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 18:42 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolut
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 18:22 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-09 15:15
> > ---
> > If you can provide all input file
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 17:13 ---
Here is the patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00094.html
to restore the old behavior for stdin.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1437
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 17:00 ---
The reason for
/* For command line args, also try to demangle type encodings. */
result = cplus_demangle (mangled_name, flags | DMGL_TYPES);
is that the assembly code may have
.section.eh_frame,"a",@pro
Hi Peter,
tonite I tried to compile the new version of binutils (2.16.1)
on various SUN-Workstations without success.
(1) First of all, there saemas to be a bug, if you use
"./configure --prefix /usr/gnu"
I got errors when typeing "make" in the sub directories
"bfd" and "lib
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 15:03 ---
Those special handling for `.', `$' and `_' used to be for stdin only. I think
it makes some sense sine they are added to assembly code.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1437
--- You are rece
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-10 14:58 ---
The old one also has
if (mbuffer[0] == '.' || mbuffer[0] == '$')
++skip_first;
for stdin. It is for assembly code where we may have
.section .text.Check__6UArrayi
mov $Check__
Hi Bryce,
"reg-name-std" needs to be replaced with "reg-names-std"
So it does. I have committed the obvious patch (attached).
Cheers
Nick
binutils/ChangeLog
2005-10-10 Bryce Schober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* doc/binutils.texi (objdump): Fix typo: -reg-name-std should be
-re
35 matches
Mail list logo
