------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-11 02:49 ------- You need to find out why those symbols aren't defined, given that ld.so.1 is loaded via DT_NEEDED in libc.so.6. I saw a few possibilities:
1. A bfd/ld bug which is platform dependent. 2. Different binutils sources. 3. Platform issue. You can do a binary search on binutils in CVS to see which patch causes this issue. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1443 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
