--- Additional Comments From dddu88 at cox dot net 2005-03-10 05:42 ---
Hi, Ben, I just downloaded the new released source code for today, and tested
again, it really worked for me. thanks for your testing.
David
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi, Ben, what is your source/src directory, I d
--- Additional Comments From dddu88 at cox dot net 2005-03-10 04:16 ---
Hi, Ben, what is your source/src directory, I downloaded the binutils-2.15
source code, there is no source/src directory, the directory structure I have is
binutils-2.15/binutils, there are two cases of running confi
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2005-03-10
00:01 ---
I built a copy of binutils like so:
~/source/src/configure --target=rs6000-aix && make all-binutils
and ran objdump directly from the build directory like so:
./binutils/objdump -d foo.o
It worked.
I tried to configure with --target=rs6000-ibm-aix, and built the binutils, when
I tested the objdump.exe file with objdump -i, it gave me error: "objdump: can't
set BFD default target to 'rs6000-ibm-aix': Invalid bfd target", I tried to
configure with --target=rs6000-aix as described in readme, it
"David Du" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, anybody can answer this question: objdump not working for IBM AIX xcoff
> object file?
Why don't you open a PR at http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ so that we
don't lose track of this? Thanks.
Ian
___
bug-b
Hi, anybody can answer this question: objdump not working for IBM AIX xcoff
object file?
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: David Du [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:52 AM
To: Ben Elliston; bug-binutils@gnu.org
Subject: RE: Run objdump under windows XP for X
HI, Ben, thanks for your response, I checked and redid my testing, I used
the right objdump.exe file, after I did make all and built the binutil, all
the exe files are under the binutils directory, so I just ran the
objdump.exe file under that directory, ./objdump -i, and also I tried and
changed
Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IC:%s [%s] has no terminals or sub-classes\n
>
> "terminals" in this case, I am assuming, don't mean VDU installations
> or command-line windows. Would I be correct in translating this to
> mean "terminal variables"? I am unsure. Please dispel a litt
Hello :)
I am currently translating the file opcodes-2.15 into Vietnamese for
The Translation Project at the University of MontrÃal. I want to make
sure my translation is correct, so I hope you don't mind if I check a
few definitions with you.
1.
IC:%s [%s] has no terminals or sub-classes\n
"te
