On 10/18/22 1:47 PM, Andrew Neff via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again
SHell wrote:
Description:
Using the "caller" command on a line of bash code in a process substitution
has been incorrect from bash 3.2 through 5.1, but I could write my code in such a way to
work around it. Some of t
t: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 7:09 PM
To: Andrew Neff
Cc: bug-bash@gnu.org
Subject: Re: caller returns wrong line number in command substitution
There are no command substitutions in any of your examples.
A command substitution is what you get with $( ) (or if you
really like obsolete syntax for s
There are no command substitutions in any of your examples.
A command substitution is what you get with $( ) (or if you
really like obsolete syntax for some reason, ``).
What you're showing is process substitution.
This has nothing to do with whether or not there is an issue
here that's worth fi
