On Tuesday 20 March 2012 15:55:18 Chet Ramey wrote:
> or the even simpler
>
> f()
> {
> f | f &
>
> }
> f
i like the variant that uses ":" instead of "f":
:(){ :|:& };:
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 3/20/12 2:17 PM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> 2012-03-20 16:47:51 +, Eamonn Smyth:
>> Without sounding alarmist, I can break my machine using bash. I also have a
>> fix. I shall be officially releasing the c code this weekend at the
>> hackathon london.
> [...]
>
> A DOS vector often found is
2012-03-20 16:47:51 +, Eamonn Smyth:
> Without sounding alarmist, I can break my machine using bash. I also have a
> fix. I shall be officially releasing the c code this weekend at the
> hackathon london.
[...]
A DOS vector often found is bash *scripts* is when a script
takes user input in a v
Thanks Greg that makes more sense.
I would have recognised DoS, dos though :) showing my age I guess.
I'm inclined to doubt though that it can be defined as a Bash DoS
whatever it is, otherwise a lot of installation/bash scripts would be up
for the chop ;).
Am 20.03.2012 19:00, schrieb Greg W
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 06:47:17PM +0100, dethrophes wrote:
> Secondly when you say dos? you mean a windows command prompt or you
> actually mean DOS 6.22, dosbox, or a text box what do you consider dos?.
He meant DoS, or "Denial of Service". He believes he has found some sort
of security bug/ex
Am 20.03.2012 18:04, schrieb Greg Wooledge:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:47:51PM +, Eamonn Smyth wrote:
Without sounding alarmist, I can break my machine using bash. I also have a
fix. I shall be officially releasing the c code this weekend at the
hackathon london.
You included some C++ code
Am 20.03.2012 17:47, schrieb Eamonn Smyth:
Without sounding alarmist, I can break my machine using bash. I also have a
fix. I shall be officially releasing the c code this weekend at the
hackathon london.
As my code following correctly implements the logic the dos attack vector
is negated.
The
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:47:51PM +, Eamonn Smyth wrote:
> Without sounding alarmist, I can break my machine using bash. I also have a
> fix. I shall be officially releasing the c code this weekend at the
> hackathon london.
You included some C++ code (or possibly C code, if you're allowed to
Without sounding alarmist, I can break my machine using bash. I also have a
fix. I shall be officially releasing the c code this weekend at the
hackathon london.
As my code following correctly implements the logic the dos attack vector
is negated.
The replacement code
/*Do openql maths Now*/
