On Tuesday 20 March 2012 15:55:18 Chet Ramey wrote: > or the even simpler > > f() > { > f | f & > > } > f
i like the variant that uses ":" instead of "f": :(){ :|:& };: -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 20 March 2012 15:55:18 Chet Ramey wrote: > or the even simpler > > f() > { > f | f & > > } > f
i like the variant that uses ":" instead of "f": :(){ :|:& };: -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.