Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Chet indicated in a private e-mail that he thinks he knows what causes
> this one.
It's not hard to stop the hangs. The hard part is making sure you get
the right answer.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live S
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Stuart Shelton wrote:
The following problems exist, at the very least, in bash 3.1.16,
3.1.17, and 3.2.1 - I assume it affects the all bash-3.x releases.
The hang is a different issue that seems to affect bash when built with
compilers other than gcc; I can reproduce it
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:42:13PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> OK, but knowing that helps only a little. There is still no indication
> of what the problem with bash might be. Since I have no 64-bit linux
> or sparc systems, I need a place to start.
>
Chet - thanks for the reply.
Park this f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:25:17PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Given the involvement of ld-linux.so.2, I tried building and using a
>> statically linked bash (3.2), and sure enough it does NOT exhibit the
>> segfaults at all.
>>
>
> It seems I was a bit premature
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:25:17PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Given the involvement of ld-linux.so.2, I tried building and using a
> statically linked bash (3.2), and sure enough it does NOT exhibit the
> segfaults at all.
>
It seems I was a bit premature here. The static bash does inde
