[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:25:17PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Given the involvement of ld-linux.so.2, I tried building and using a
>> statically linked bash (3.2), and sure enough it does NOT exhibit the
>> segfaults at all.
>>
>
> It seems I was a bit premature here. The static bash does indeed
> segfault with the same symptoms:
OK, but knowing that helps only a little. There is still no indication
of what the problem with bash might be. Since I have no 64-bit linux
or sparc systems, I need a place to start.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live Strong. No day but today.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
_______________________________________________
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
