[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I assume my original bug is still open, though?
>>
>> I thought I answered that. If you prefer physical paths, use `set -o
>> physical' to force them.
>
> I'm not sure I understand. Whether I want to use logical paths or not
> seems independent of whether or not the c
I assume my original bug is still open, though?
I thought I answered that. If you prefer physical paths, use `set -o
physical' to force them.
I'm not sure I understand. Whether I want to use logical paths or not
seems independent of whether or not the command I'm currently typing only
resp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I assume my original bug is still open, though? One solution would be to
> be able to specify logical vs physical pathnames in programmable
> completion.
I thought I answered that. If you prefer physical paths, use
`set -o physical' to force them. The completion code
The shell's concept of a logical view of the file system (the default,
as specified by POSIX) is maintained by `cd' and communicated to other
processes via $PWD. Other processes may or may not choose to use that
information. There are environments where support for $PWD is
pervasive.
Ah, th