I assume my original bug is still open, though?
I thought I answered that. If you prefer physical paths, use `set -o
physical' to force them.
I'm not sure I understand. Whether I want to use logical paths or not
seems independent of whether or not the command I'm currently typing only
respects physical paths. So if I don't want to set -o physical, ls
completion like in my original mail should still be consistent, right?
What am I missing?
$ ls ..
y
$ ls ../<Tab>
f x
Thanks,
Kartik
_______________________________________________
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
