On 06/03/2013 03:44 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2013-06-03 15:21, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> On 06/03/2013 11:47 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>>
>>> Peter Rosin wrote:
Yup, I'm happy to test anything you come up with (within reason :-).
>>> Here it is. Does it work for you?
>>>
>>
On 2013-06-03 15:21, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 11:47 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>
>> Peter Rosin wrote:
>>>
>>> Yup, I'm happy to test anything you come up with (within reason :-).
>>>
>> Here it is. Does it work for you?
>>
>> PATCH] tests: fix spurious failure when 'etags' prog
On 2013-06-03 12:02, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> This is a follow-up to the commit fixing automake bug#14493.
>
> * t/cxx-demo.sh: Also check that the built program returns the
> correct (i.e., zero) exit status when run. And improve comments
> a little while at it.
Good catch!
Cheers,
Peter
On 06/03/2013 11:47 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> Peter Rosin wrote:
>>
>> Yup, I'm happy to test anything you come up with (within reason :-).
>>
> Here it is. Does it work for you?
>
> PATCH] tests: fix spurious failure when 'etags' program is Exuberant Ctags
>
> Fixes automake bug#14517.
>
On 06/03/2013 12:47 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:29:08AM +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> You are perfectly right. I thought the sleeps implicit in configure
>> invocations were enough to avoid this kind of issues, but after a more
>> careful consideration I realized I wa
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:29:08AM +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> You are perfectly right. I thought the sleeps implicit in configure
> invocations were enough to avoid this kind of issues, but after a more
> careful consideration I realized I was mistaken (see commit message in
> the patch bel
This is a follow-up to the commit fixing automake bug#14493.
* t/cxx-demo.sh: Also check that the built program returns the
correct (i.e., zero) exit status when run. And improve comments
a little while at it.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini
---
t/cxx-demo.sh | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 ins
tags 14517 + patch
thanks
On 05/31/2013 12:02 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2013-05-31 11:58, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> On 05/31/2013 11:52 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> I'm not going to write the patch this week though, and possibly
>>> not in the near future as I have other things ($$$) to do as we
tags 14528 + patch
severity 14528 minor.
stop
Hi Colin, thanks for the report
On 06/01/2013 01:20 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> Automake 1.13.2 failed t/remake-configure-dependencies.sh in two
> consecutive attempts on Ubuntu autobuilders. On inspection I found that
> our autobuilder network happene
