On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:29:08AM +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > You are perfectly right. I thought the sleeps implicit in configure > invocations were enough to avoid this kind of issues, but after a more > careful consideration I realized I was mistaken (see commit message in > the patch below for an extended rationale). > > Can you confirm the patch works for you?
Before this patch, I got 32 passes from 100 runs; after this patch, I get 100 passes from 100 runs. So it looks good to me. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]