On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:40:11 + "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>
> I hesitate to say this, because I'm talking to someone whose
> reputation is stellar and because my own biases may show slightly :)
>
> Don't - under any circumstances whatever - use Fedora on a
> production system or a sys
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:44:46 +0100 Tim Cutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28 Aug 2008, at 3:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I respectfully request we keep the emails limited to
> > beowulf-related topic. Please take your conversations about
> > scientists-programmers offline.
[*snip*]
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:00:19 -0400 "Perry E. Metzger" wrote:
>
> Getting back to the original topic, a set of C++ classes that handled
> APL style array operations and automatically parallelized them on
> vector processors would be quite neat, and would actually be a
> legitimate use of C++ (unlik
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:29:11 -0400 "Perry E. Metzger" wrote:
> I think part of the issue is that most people doing scientific
> computing don't have computer science backgrounds, which is a
> shame.
Formal CS training can certainly help but I don't view it as a
requirement. I've met some remarka
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:53:11 -0400 "Perry E. Metzger" wrote:
> "Perry E. Metzger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have a copy of the C99 document and it is indeed required that the
> > locations be consecutive (though there can of course be padding for
> > alignment purposes if you have an array
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:33:57 -0500 (EST) "Robert G. Brown" wrote:
> >
> >> Any idea if the openssh people are going to incorporate the patch
> >> permanently? Any hope of replacing the "Ciphers none" option
> >> (even with
> >
> > I think they've permanently rejected it.
>
> G. Do the PSC f
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:56:48 -0400 Larry Stewart wrote:
>
> For X86 archtectures, it actually makes a very noticable performance
> change (30%?) to use build switches that are appropriate for your
> machines, rather than the generic switches chosen by Red Had or
> Novell.
Before adding to this t
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 "Robert G. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not certain that I "like" the idea of fully integrating extras
> into the main core, though. The problem with FC+extras+updates even
> now is that 6500 packages is a bit difficult to get a human brain
> around, especially when
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 "Douglas Eadline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My understanding is that FC7 will include distro building tools
> for both custom rolls and live CD/DVD's. So I think
> you will start to see a lot of customized FC rolls that
> contain a subset of packages for a specific "domain".
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 "Robert G. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And re. the future version of Scientific Linux, there has been
> > debate on the list re. co-operating with CENTos and essentially
> > using CENTos as a base, and SL being an overlay of specific
> > application and library RPMs
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 "Robert G. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm planning to do the rewiring of cables today soon, so if you know
> something about his please respond "soon".
Hi Robert,
I can't say anything about your local wiring legalities but stayonline
(located in near-by Raleigh) h
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:54:46 -0400 (EDT) "Robert G. Brown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Kyle Spaans wrote:
>
> > Do I really need MPI/OpenMPI/OpenMP/PVM? If so, does that mean I
> > should suck it up and learn Fortran/C/C++? Or can I just devise my
> > own message passing sys
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:22:30 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew
M.A. Cater) wrote:
>
> Fedora Legacy just closed its doors - if you take a couple of months
> to get your Uebercluster up and running, you're 1/3 of the way
> through your FC cycle :( It doesn't square.
Speaking of which, I recently b
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:59:47 -0500 (EST) "Robert G. Brown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Glen Beane wrote:
>
> > If you are doing mostly MPI, I would strongly reccoment TORQUE (a
> > free, open source, OpenPBS fork with *many* enhancements). I would
> > not reccoment OpenPBS, a
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:48:04 -0500 (EST) "Robert G. Brown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
I wanted to respond earlier to this thread but RGB has already done a
better job of covering the points I hoped to make. :-)
In my experience FC makes a very usable cluster OS.
> Also, plenty of fo
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 21:23:03 +0200
"Maxence Dunnewind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> i'm a user of the Ubuntu Linux OS, and also a packager for this OS.
> As you may know , packaging can be take a lot of time, mainly
> during building process.
> I would create a public cluster for help pack
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:08:05 +0200
Toon Moene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert G. Brown wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Geoff Jacobs wrote:
> >
> >> I should have been more specific and said that I do not believe
> >> any integrated benchmarks packaged and shipped by SPEC are in
> >> any WS
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 00:59 -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote:
>
> Perhaps in another decade they'll actually meet somewhere, have a
> drink together, and in a night of illicit love spawn a new language
> called Cortran, or perhaps fortraC, that groks both printf and
> hollerith, that has a binary expo
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 23:50 -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Jonathan Ennis-King wrote:
>
> > The other option is the Unix-like strategy suggested by rgb, where for
> > example the computational part is completely written in C, and then the
> > pre and post-processing which be
19 matches
Mail list logo
