On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:40:11 +0000 "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>
> I hesitate to say this, because I'm talking to someone whose
> reputation is stellar and because my own biases may show slightly :)
>
> Don't - under any circumstances whatever - use Fedora on a
> production system or a system on which you want to do real work.
>
> If you _MUST_ do it - because, for example, your hardware is too new
> and not yet supported under the Red Hat Enterprise Linux / Centos 5.4
> kernel - 2.6.18-164* if I recall correctly - then it _may_ work but
> it WILL cause you some degree of instability, interesting debugging
> interaction problems and some hours/days of frustration.
Please take a deep breath and lay off the FUD.
Fedora is a perfectly capable cluster OS. I know of a half-dozen
operational clusters (some with literally hundreds of CPUs) that rely on
it for software development, data analysis, production runs, etc., etc.
In my experience, a well-managed Fedora-based cluster will have the same
stability and usability as any other well-managed Linux cluster.
And yes, Fedora does ship with some {leading,bleeding} edge bits which
cuts *both* ways -- sometimes its a big help (e.g., kernel support for
just-released hardware) and sometimes (e.g.; newer library versions) it
can be a bit of a hassle. As others have mentioned, the short Fedora
lifetimes are not for everyone.
Unless you stumble upon a batch of truly unreliable hardware (which
does occasionally happen), the overall utility of a Linux cluster
is a *direct* result of the skill and care of those who manage it.
Ed
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD | e...@eh3.com | http://eh3.com/
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
