-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> 4. I went to a BoF on ROI on HPC investment. All the presentations in
> the BoF frustrated me. Not because they were poorly done, but because
> they tried to measure the value of a cluster by number of papers
> published that used that HPC resou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Out of curiosity, did anyone on-list manage to any of the tutorials, and
feel like sharing what was good or bad? I'm particularly interested to
hear from anyone who made it to one of,
* "Practical Fault Tolerance on Today's HPC Systems"
* "The Pract
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Its been awfully quiet around here since Vincent Diepeveen was kicked
>
I was beginning to wonder if the mailman servers were down.
___
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Pe
Okay, here's my attempt at summarizing my SC13 experience.
1. The show was actually kind of boring this year. I think this was
because there were now big new technologies or products to talk about.
Also, there's usually a lot of activity at the NOAA and OLCF booths
every years, and neither of t
Its been awfully quiet around here since Vincent Diepeveen was kicked
On 25 November 2013 20:25, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> On 11/22/2013 02:41 PM, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
>> On 11/22/13 16:15, Joe Landman wrote:
>>> On 11/22/2013 02:00 PM, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
I think "no support
Adam,
Thinks for all the information. As always, all the interesting BoF's
were always at the same time. I wanted to many of the BoF's you
mentionedbut ended up going to "sexier" ones. My own SC13 wrapup to be
coming soon.
Prentice
On 11/23/2013 03:44 PM, Adam DeConinck wrote:
> -BEGIN PG
On 11/22/2013 02:41 PM, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
> On 11/22/13 16:15, Joe Landman wrote:
>> On 11/22/2013 02:00 PM, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
>>> I think "no support" may be a bit overreaching, but nevertheless, I
>> I couldn't find a person I spoke to about this from the list in support
>> of t
I hope I'm not too late to this party to add my 2 cents!
While I don't dispute the legal definition of COTS as stand for
"commercial off the-shelf", I think most people, especially in the Linux
cluster community are more familiar with COTS meaning "COMMODITY
off-the-shelf."
That is a subtle
On 11/15/2013 02:07 PM, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
> On 11/15/2013 12:28 PM, Peter St. John wrote:
>> I missed the 4-letter acronym; my grasp stops at TLA's :/
>> By SOHO you don't mean "self organizing holons" although that idea is
>> germane to distributed processing. So what's a SOHO?
> Just be
