- Forwarded message from Ted Carnevale -
From: Ted Carnevale
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:40:51 -0500
To: Computational Neuroscience group
Subject: [Comp-neuro] Course: Parallelizing NEURON Models
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3
B41;286;0c> And, up front, I work for Intel and even on Intel(r) Xeon Phi(c)
>coprocessor (yes, that is the official Intel branding!) software. (Though
>I've been on this list since w..a..y back, well before I worked for Intel!)
It's great to have vendors participate!
well, at least in a minimally
> Hey team Beowulf,
> I, as most of you, always give a big hairy technical eyeball to any
> statements that include MPI and "cloud". I know I'm biased, but I do think
> Jason does a great job of >explaining "the bench", i.e. never assume raw
> horsepower until you test it! Always reminds me o
Jim,
That's great and everything, but what are their thermal conductivities? :-)
Prentice
On 03/04/2013 06:17 PM, Lux, Jim (337C) wrote:
> http://hometown-pasadena.com/history/a-very-punny-mystery-resolved/8428
>
> Reddi-Whip is VERY different from Cool-Whip.. the former is basically
> whipping
Up front, I work for Intel and, even write software for the Intel(r) Xeon
Phi(tm) coprocessor.
On 12 Feb 2013, at 16:38, Richard Walsh wrote:
> Curious about the observed benefits of hyper-threading, which generally offers
> little to floating-point intensive HPC computations where functional un
Answering a little late, sorry...
And, up front, I work for Intel and even on Intel(r) Xeon Phi(c) coprocessor
(yes, that is the official Intel branding!) software. (Though I've been on this
list since w..a..y back, well before I worked for Intel!)
On 27 Feb 2013, at 21:01, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
