This is drifting off topic but I want to clarify two points:
- I'm not advocating violating any licensing agreement. I am
interested in aspects of environments which interact with license
management code.
- I suspect attempting to move a Windows VM between two different VM
implementations is tro
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Stuart Barkley wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 at 12:01 -, Robert G. Brown wrote:
XPPro will run forever on the virtualized hardware interface as long
as I can get linux to boot and run devices on the toplevel system.
If I change machines, my XPPro VM can go with me without
Tom Rockwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Intel assigns the same power consumption to different clockspeeds of L,
> E, X series XEON. All L series have the same rating, all E series etc.
> So, taking their numbers, the fastest of each type will always have the
> best performance per watt.
Wrong, well they
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 at 12:01 -, Robert G. Brown wrote:
> XPPro will run forever on the virtualized hardware interface as long
> as I can get linux to boot and run devices on the toplevel system.
> If I change machines, my XPPro VM can go with me without all of the
> tedious crap from Windows U
Call for Papers:
Special Issue of Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing on
"Data Intensive Computing"
---
Data intensive computing is posing many challenges in exploiting
parallelism of current and upcoming comp
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:04 -0500, David Ramirez wrote:
> Still a newbie in HPC, in the first stages of building a Beowulf
> cluster (8 nodes).
>
> I wonder if anybody out there has used Linux virtual machines in the
> head node, just to be able to experiment with different configurations
> & dep
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 at 12:01pm, Robert G. Brown wrote
Unless/until Xen or KVM or something else comes out with a similarly
powerful and tricked out console and ease of use and (still, overall)
reliability, VMware will be on my personal laptops for the rest of time.
It's just too useful a tool to
Greg Lindahl wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:52:07PM -0500, Rahul Nabar wrote:
"Forwarding Rate 131 Mpps" How does that tie in to the big picture?
Most layer 3 devices are not capable of forwarding full line-rate
traffic of tiny packets. You should go hunt down a lab report on
switch testi
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Tim Cutts wrote:
On 15 Sep 2009, at 11:55 pm, Dmitry Zaletnev wrote:
When install CentOS 5.3, you get Xen virtual machine for free, with a nice
interface, and in it, modes with internal network and NAT to outside world
work simultaneously, witch is not the case of Sun xV
On 15 Sep 2009, at 11:55 pm, Dmitry Zaletnev wrote:
When install CentOS 5.3, you get Xen virtual machine for free, with
a nice interface, and in it, modes with internal network and NAT to
outside world work simultaneously, witch is not the case of Sun xVM
VirtualBox. Never used VMWare beca
When install CentOS 5.3, you get Xen virtual machine for free, with a nice
interface, and in it, modes with internal network and NAT to outside world work
simultaneously, witch is not the case of Sun xVM VirtualBox. Never used VMWare
because of its value of $189, people say it's a good VM. But w
Hi,
Intel assigns the same power consumption to different clockspeeds of L,
E, X series XEON. All L series have the same rating, all E series etc.
So, taking their numbers, the fastest of each type will always have the
best performance per watt. And there is no power consumption penalty
fo
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 at 14:04 -, David Ramirez wrote:
> Still a newbie in HPC, in the first stages of building a Beowulf
> cluster (8 nodes).
Also a newbie to HPC, but now accumulating systems very quickly.
> I wonder if anybody out there has used Linux virtual machines in the
> head node, ju
At the RedHat Summit a couple of weeks ago, RH said that with a switch
from Xen to KVM and lots of tuning, they were able to get the I/O
overhead down to 5%. I thought that was pretty impressive. They also
introduced a new product RedHat Enterprise Virtualization, which is
supposed to support pro
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:18:27PM +0100, stephen mulcahy wrote:
I'm not sure what else people read from bonnie++ results but I normally
I realize people mostly prefer IOZone, or similar.
Personally, I like bonnie++ for the general overview it gives. It's a
shame there i
Eugen Leitl wrote:
Below bonnie++ stats are pretty bad for a RAID 10 of 14 SATA
drives (WD RE4, 2 TByte), right?
Well, we'd suggest using fio rather than bonnie++, but I'll save that
for a post somewhere else.
[ora...@localhost data]$ bonnie++ -d /data/blah
[...]
Version 1.03 --
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:18:27PM +0100, stephen mulcahy wrote:
> I'm not sure what else people read from bonnie++ results but I normally
I realize people mostly prefer IOZone, or similar.
> focus on the sequential output block (which I think of as "block write
> speed" and sequential input b
Hi,
I'm not sure what else people read from bonnie++ results but I normally
focus on the sequential output block (which I think of as "block write
speed" and sequential input block (which I think of as "block read
speed"). Smarter folk on this list may be able to provide a more
scientific ana
Below bonnie++ stats are pretty bad for a RAID 10 of 14 SATA
drives (WD RE4, 2 TByte), right?
[ora...@localhost data]$ bonnie++ -d /data/blah
Writing with putc()...done
Writing intelligently...done
Rewriting...done
Reading with getc()...done
Reading intelligently...done
start 'em...done...done...
On 16 Sep 2009, at 8:23 am, Alan Ward wrote:
I have been working quite a lot with VBox, mostly for server stuff.
I agree it can be quite impressive, and has some nice features (e.g.
do not stop a machine, sleep it - and wake up pretty fast).
On the other hand, we found that anything that
I have been working quite a lot with VBox, mostly for server stuff. I agree it
can be quite impressive, and has some nice features (e.g. do not stop a
machine, sleep it - and wake up pretty fast).
On the other hand, we found that anything that has to do with disk access is
pretty slow, special
21 matches
Mail list logo
