Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:18:27PM +0100, stephen mulcahy wrote:
I'm not sure what else people read from bonnie++ results but I normally
I realize people mostly prefer IOZone, or similar.
Personally, I like bonnie++ for the general overview it gives. It's a
shame there isn't a public collection of good bonnie++ date people can
use to compare their results with others (for a general, is my hardware
performing in the right ballpark, type check)
In your case, I'm reading the results below as a block write speed of
455 MB/sec and a block read speed of 528 MB/sec which seems pretty good
Thanks, this was the kind of comment I was looking for. The raw
aggregate disk speed is roughly 770 MB/sec, so this result is not all
that bad.
Like I said, maybe wait for some of the storage experts to wake up and
respond and you may get a more accurate analysis of your results.
-stephen
--
Stephen Mulcahy Atlantic Linux http://www.atlanticlinux.ie
Registered in Ireland, no. 376591 (144 Ros Caoin, Roscam, Galway)
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
