what's wrong with 500k job submissions? to me, the existence of "array
jobs"
is an admission that the job/queueing system is inefficient.
When I compare this e.g. to C:
- a loop like:
for (i=1;i<=10;i++)
printf("Hello from run %d.\n", i);
- and you can guess: 100,000 times:
p
I didn't respond yesterday ... been ridiculously busy ... really :(
Chris Dagdigian wrote:
briefly on the "FUD": As one of the users/admin types who watched jobs
go into an unkillable (without power-cycle) state, I can assure you that
the problems with PBS (at the time) were legendary and not
Hi Mark,
On Feb 18, 2009, at 1:32 AM, Mark Hahn wrote:
searches. Without array task scheduling this would require 500,000
individual job submissions. The fact that I never met a serious PBS
shop that had not
what's wrong with 500k job submissions? to me, the existence of
"array jobs"
is
Am 18.02.2009 um 07:32 schrieb Mark Hahn:
searches. Without array task scheduling this would require 500,000
individual job submissions. The fact that I never met a serious
PBS shop that had not
what's wrong with 500k job submissions? to me, the existence of
"array jobs"
is an admission
