- "John Hearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm personally unconvinced of the overwhelming justification
> for (say) the Ordnance Survey to give all of its mapping data
> away for free.
I think their angle is that as a UK taxpayer you already
own the data as you paid for them to create it.
Joe Landman wrote:
Gerry Creager wrote:
I'm running WRF on ranger, the 580 TF Sun cluster at utexas.edu. I
can complete the WRF single domain run, using 384 cores in ~30 min
wall clock time. At the WRF Users Conference last week, the number of
folks I talked to running WRF on workstations
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 20:20 +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
>
> Since about a year, it's been clear to me that weather forecasting
> (i.e., running a more or less sophisticated atmospheric model to provide
> weather predictions) is going to be "mainstream" in the sense that every
> business that need
In message from Bernd Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 28 Jun
2008 19:04:50 +0200):
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Li, Bo wrote:
Hello,
Sorry, I don't have the same applications as you.
Did you compile them with gcc? If gcc, then -o3 can do some
optimization.
-march=k8 is enough I think.
As Mik
Gerry Creager wrote:
I'm running WRF on ranger, the 580 TF Sun cluster at utexas.edu. I can
complete the WRF single domain run, using 384 cores in ~30 min wall
clock time. At the WRF Users Conference last week, the number of folks
I talked to running WRF on workstations or "operationally"
Toon,
Can you drop a line on how important RAM is for weather forecasting
in latest type of calculations you're performing?
Thanks,
Vincent
On Jun 30, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
Jim Lux wrote:
Yep. And for good reason. Even a big DoD job is still tiny in
Nvidia's scale of op
I guess that's why the Dutch Army might be doing experiments with the
weather as of lately, without informing the public?
- creating fog (during the new years celebratoin i heard huge
atmospheric booms which were not caused by fireworks,
and despite being a normal temperature far above zero,
Toon Moene wrote:
Jim Lux wrote:
Yep. And for good reason. Even a big DoD job is still tiny in
Nvidia's scale of operations. We face this all the time with NASA
work. Semiconductor manufacturers have no real reason to produce
special purpose or customized versions of their products for spa
im guessing when u say 4 gpu's you are talking bout using sli?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Alcides Simao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it very difficult to make paralell programs work in a GPU cluster? say,
> a single PC with 4 GPUs. I would very much like to put GAMESS and NWCHEM
> workin
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Li, Bo wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry, I don't have the same applications as you.
> Did you compile them with gcc? If gcc, then -o3 can do some optimization.
> -march=k8 is enough I think.
As Mikhail wrote in his first mail, he uses binaries from Gaussian Inc. Can
gfortran in t
Jim Lux wrote:
Yep. And for good reason. Even a big DoD job is still tiny in Nvidia's
scale of operations. We face this all the time with NASA work.
Semiconductor manufacturers have no real reason to produce special
purpose or customized versions of their products for space use, because
th
Anyone have minutes or conclusions to offer from this scheduler smack
down?
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Douglas Eadline
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 5:47 PM
To: beowulf@beowulf.org
Subject: [Beowulf] June New York/Jersey HPC
Is it very difficult to make paralell programs work in a GPU cluster? say, a
single PC with 4 GPUs. I would very much like to put GAMESS and NWCHEM
working in such machine. However, I don't know how are is the task to
achieve. If it was not very difficult, such a device would be a great
machine for
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 07:42:31PM -0400, Peter St. John wrote:
> You mean the Ottawa Linux Symposium? You have a link for them?
Certainly! http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2008/
It's in late July, registration prices by now are getting high though I
imagine. (But not for students like me! :P)
_
14 matches
Mail list logo