Chris Samuel wrote:
On Thursday 04 January 2007 04:27, David Mathog wrote:
Joe and I aparently exist in parallel software universes ;-).
Being MPI means it can take advantage of high speed interconnects (e.g.
building it with MPICH-GM to use native Myrinet). Of course whether that
would
On Thursday 04 January 2007 04:27, David Mathog wrote:
> Joe and I aparently exist in parallel software universes ;-).
Being MPI means it can take advantage of high speed interconnects (e.g.
building it with MPICH-GM to use native Myrinet). Of course whether that
would benefit HMMER is somethi
On Thursday 04 January 2007 02:53, Mark Hahn wrote:
> personally, I'm pretty convinced that MPI implementations should stay
> out of the jobstarter business, and go with straight agentless (ssh-based)
> job spawning.
Noo... please not ssh again, make the pain go away!
Seriously though, this
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 23:01, Reuti wrote:
> - Do you need support for Tight Integrated Linda (I think this will
> most often mean Gaussian) (and PVM) parallel jobs: use SGE
Interesting, why so ? I know a number of sites around Australia (including a
1900+ CPU cluster) run Gaussian usi
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 15:55, Nathan Moore wrote:
> WARNING: server not specified (set $pbsserver)
This has already been answered on the Torque list, but for the folks on the
Beowulf list this was the issue.
cheers!
Chris
--
Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Deputy Syst
Torque was really easy to install, but it seems like my /etc/hosts
file must be screwed up, as I can't get the cluster nodes to
respond. Specifically, within a cluster of 3 machines, each having
an /etc/hosts file of:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
199.17
or download TORQUE: http://www.clusterresources.com/pages/products.php
-Bill
-Original Message-
From: "Ed Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2007 12:30 pm
To: "Robert G. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "beowulf@beowulf.org"
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] picking out a job sc
When I switch off our small (16 node) cluster it trips the power switch. Guess
there is a temporary power surge. Are there any devices (line conditioners?)
that will prevent this? Experiences?
Mattijs
--
Mattijs Janssens
___
Beowulf mailing list, Be
David Mathog wrote:
Short OT break. http://code.google.com/p/mpihmmer/ an MPI
implementation of HMMer 2.3.2.
There's also my PVM version of 2.3.2 from 2003/2004, with a few
minor fixes since then rolled up into the lastest distribution:
ftp://saf.bio.caltech.edu/pub/software/molbio/para
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:59:47 -0500 (EST) "Robert G. Brown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Glen Beane wrote:
>
> > If you are doing mostly MPI, I would strongly reccoment TORQUE (a
> > free, open source, OpenPBS fork with *many* enhancements). I would
> > not reccoment OpenPBS, a
> Short OT break. http://code.google.com/p/mpihmmer/ an MPI
> implementation of HMMer 2.3.2.
There's also my PVM version of 2.3.2 from 2003/2004, with a few
minor fixes since then rolled up into the lastest distribution:
ftp://saf.bio.caltech.edu/pub/software/molbio/parallelhmmer.tar.gz
Mark Hahn wrote:
> personally, I'm pretty convinced that MPI implementations should stay
> out of the jobstarter business, and go with straight agentless (ssh-based)
> job spawning.
I'm curious about your reasoning, Mark. We've had nightmare situations
for years with ssh-based job spawning. The
But, originally, my question was about the quality and reliability of the
brand of *LevelOne* SW (Unmanaged, Gigabit ports), in comparison to its
I've never heard "level one" used in this context. the closest would be
"layer 2", which refers to mac-based switching, and might be what you mean.
" p1_8544: p4_error: Timeout in Establishing connection to remote process:
0 "
rm_l_1_8667: (359.417969) net_send: could not write to fd=5, errno=104
We have been trying the same for the past two days and we didnt get any
solution for the above.
but what have you tried? I would guess that th
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Glen Beane wrote:
If you are doing mostly MPI, I would strongly reccoment TORQUE (a
free, open source, OpenPBS fork with *many* enhancements). I would not
reccoment OpenPBS, as Altair no longer updates it and hasn't for quite
some time. TORQUE has great integration with mpi
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Leif Nixon wrote:
"Robert G. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also, plenty of folks on this list have done just fine running "frozen"
linux distros "as is" for years on cluster nodes. If they aren't broke,
and live behind a firewall so security fixes aren't terribly impo
If you are doing mostly MPI, I would strongly reccoment TORQUE (a free, open
source, OpenPBS fork with *many* enhancements). I would not reccoment OpenPBS,
as Altair no longer updates it and hasn't for quite some time. TORQUE has
great integration with mpich by using mpiexec from Pete at
(
Hi,
Am 03.01.2007 um 02:23 schrieb Chris Samuel:
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 08:06, Chris Dagdigian wrote:
Both should be fine although if you are considering *PBS you should
look at both Torque (a fork of OpenPBS I think)
although I'm somehow biased to suggest SGE, I also check from time
"Robert G. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, plenty of folks on this list have done just fine running "frozen"
> linux distros "as is" for years on cluster nodes. If they aren't broke,
> and live behind a firewall so security fixes aren't terribly important,
> why fix them?
Because you
19 matches
Mail list logo
