* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 12:16:32PM CEST:
> + - In 1.10b, the `parallel-tests' driver introduced per-extension test
> +driver variables `_LOG_COMPILER', defined as
> +
> + $(_LOG_COMPILE) $(AM__LOG_FLAGS) $(_LOG_FLAGS)
> +
> +for extensions `.ext' registered in
* Akim Demaille wrote on Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:02:51PM CEST:
> Le 30 mars 09 à 21:37, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
>> I mean with
>> TESTS = foo bar.test baz.chk
>> TEST_EXTENSIONS = .chk
>>
>> then foo.log and bar.test.log (sic!) will be generated using explicit
>> rules, while baz.log will be ge
Le 30 mars 09 à 21:37, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
But what is a non-extension rule? You mean if the rule is
foo: ...
?
I mean with
TESTS = foo bar.test baz.chk
TEST_EXTENSIONS = .chk
then foo.log and bar.test.log (sic!) will be generated using explicit
rules, while baz.log will b
* Akim Demaille wrote on Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:25:30PM CEST:
> Le 24 mars 09 à 22:57, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
>> How about this? I really appreciate a look over this.
>
> I really appreciate your work :)
Thanks!
>> Note that for extension .foo, the variable names will be FOO_LOG_*,
>> i.e.,
Le 24 mars 09 à 22:57, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
Hi Akim,
Hi Ralf!
* Akim Demaille wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 01:52:33PM CET:
Le 14 mars 09 à 12:08, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
Corollary: the test driver may not be called CXXCOMPILE. General:
For extension `.ext', we cannot use `EXTCOM
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:57:16PM CET:
> How about this? I really appreciate a look over this.
>
> Note that for extension .foo, the variable names will be FOO_LOG_*,
> i.e., remove the dot, then uppercase the rest.
>
> I chose to go all the way and add AM_*FLAGS too.
>
Hi Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 01:52:33PM CET:
> Le 14 mars 09 à 12:08, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
>
>> Corollary: the test driver may not be called CXXCOMPILE. General:
>> For extension `.ext', we cannot use `EXTCOMPILE' as driver.
>> ext_COMPILE or
>> extCOMPILE
>>
>> s
Le 14 mars 09 à 12:08, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
Corollary: the test driver may not be called CXXCOMPILE. General:
For extension `.ext', we cannot use `EXTCOMPILE' as driver.
ext_COMPILE or
extCOMPILE
seem awkward to me too, as these do not allow for generalization
either, and the notationa
This needs some thinking about the naming scheme to use. Here's why:
The current Automake default compile naming scheme has the assumption
that file extensions have only one default processing output. For
example, .c and .cpp become .$(OBJEXT), .y become .c, and so on.
Texinfo is an exception, b
