* Akim Demaille wrote on Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:25:30PM CEST: > Le 24 mars 09 à 22:57, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit : >> How about this? I really appreciate a look over this. > > I really appreciate your work :)
Thanks! >> Note that for extension .foo, the variable names will be FOO_LOG_*, >> i.e., remove the dot, then uppercase the rest. >> >> I chose to go all the way and add AM_*FLAGS too. >> >> One could, as a generalization, even add, for the non-extension rules, >> add >> LOG_COMPILER = $(LOG_COMPILE) $(AM_LOG_FLAGS) $(LOG_FLAGS) > > I think you meant > > LOG_COMPILE = $(LOG_COMPILER) $(AM_LOG_FLAGS) $(LOG_FLAGS) Yes, thanks. > But what is a non-extension rule? You mean if the rule is > > foo: ... > > ? I mean with TESTS = foo bar.test baz.chk TEST_EXTENSIONS = .chk then foo.log and bar.test.log (sic!) will be generated using explicit rules, while baz.log will be generated using a .chk.log suffix rule. Only the latter one will have a $(CHK_LOG_COMPILE), while there will be no $(TEST_LOG_COMPILE) (because .test was not listed as extension), nor $(LOG_COMPILE) (because foo has no extension). The above proposal was meant as: adding $(LOG_COMPILE) (as defined above) to those test runs which are generated by means of explicit rules. Makes sense now? Cheers, Ralf
