Re: doc patch for dist-hook reference

2013-01-03 Thread Karl Berry
Could you re-post this as a patch produced by "git format-patch"? Not without formatting it that way by hand; actually using git is incomprehensible to my brain, sorry, and I don't want to take the time to do it manually for two sentences. If it's not worth it to you either, just ignore the

Re: doc patch for dist-hook reference

2013-01-03 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Karl, thanks for the patch. I have some nits however On 01/03/2013 07:45 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > Pursuant to http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13324 ... > > I suggest something like the following small change to the manual, > mentioning dist-hook instead of just unconditionally say

doc patch for dist-hook reference

2013-01-03 Thread Karl Berry
Pursuant to http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13324 ... I suggest something like the following small change to the manual, mentioning dist-hook instead of just unconditionally saying "don't use directories in EXTRA_DIST". Even though dist-hook is described the next section, I for one r