Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:37:55PM CEST: > >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RW> Updated patches (added test for no-dependencies), plus an additional > RW> typo in the manual. OK? > > Yes please. Done, thanks. > RW> * automake.in (%_mac

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-14 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RW> Updated patches (added test for no-dependencies), plus an additional RW> typo in the manual. OK? Yes please. RW> Cheers, RW> Ralf RW> 2006-10-14 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RW> * automake.in (%_macro_for_cond): New va

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Updated patches (added test for no-dependencies), plus an additional typo in the manual. OK? Cheers, Ralf 2006-10-14 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in (%_macro_for_cond): New variable. (cond_stack_if): Use it for better error message about missing depen

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-12 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 15:01 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hello Ralf, > > you wrote: you == Ralf W., not me (Ralf C.;) ) > > > > Further note a small buglet in m4/as.m4: > > > > - without no-dependencies, we should not compute depmode. > > you mean that _with_ no-dependencies, we shouldn't comput

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stepan, * Stepan Kasal wrote on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 03:01:51PM CEST: > you wrote: > > > > > Further note a small buglet in m4/as.m4: > > > > - without no-dependencies, we should not compute depmode. > > you mean that _with_ no-dependencies, we shouldn't compute depmode, > right? Indeed. I

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-12 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Ralf, you wrote: > > > Further note a small buglet in m4/as.m4: > > > - without no-dependencies, we should not compute depmode. you mean that _with_ no-dependencies, we shouldn't compute depmode, right? Stepan

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Ralf, I'll address PR 492 in its thread, lest the mixup of threads and topics be un-disentangle-able. ;-) * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:49:30AM CEST: > > > > > > Yes, but ... with a simple testcase, I get this warning: > > [...] > > > With my real world test case, I do

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 21:42 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ moving from automake to -patches, and reordering; this is > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2006-10/msg00031.html ] > > * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:09:30AM CEST: > > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ moving from automake to -patches, and reordering; this is http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2006-10/msg00031.html ] * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:09:30AM CEST: > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=automake&pr=492 > Thank