On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 21:42 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ moving from automake to -patches, and reordering; this is > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2006-10/msg00031.html ] > > * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:09:30AM CEST: > > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=automake&pr=492 > > Thanks - This seems to be fixed. > > Erm, no, I don't think PR 492 is fixed. I must be missing something. AFAIS with my real world code, automake-CVS is correctly generating deps and *.o's w/ subdir-objects enabled.
> > On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 09:55 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:52:42AM CEST: > > > > OK, I just was about to try automake-CVS + autoconf-2.60 and now am > > > > facing an issue with a package using subdir-objects and *_SOURCES > > > > containing *.S + *.c: > [...] > > > > /opt/gnu/share/automake-1.9c/am/depend2.am: am__fastdepCCAS does not > > > > appear in AM_CONDITIONAL > > > > Forgot to add AM_PROG_AS? > > > > Yes, but ... with a simple testcase, I get this warning: > [...] > > With my real world test case, I don't get this warning. Probably > > because I am AC_SUBST'ing CCAS and CCASCOMPILE. > > Thanks for reporting this. Actually, two bugs here: > - there is no test for *.S, I don't understand. > - above warning is suboptimal because there is too little help > (the other warnings you posted had help, but were only present > in the test case). > > Further note a small buglet in m4/as.m4: > - without no-dependencies, we should not compute depmode. Could you elaborate what this issue is you are trying to fix? I must be missing something. > OK to apply these two patches to fix them? Or should I rather add > a test case exposure to every possible warning? > > Ralf, is the warning good enough in your real world test case now? Thanks, I'll try to check, when I get around to testing it (Probably later today). Ralf
