Re: Alternatives for check8.test...

2012-02-02 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 02/02/2012 09:16 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > > The following is what I pushed (to maint). > Thanks! > Subject: [PATCH] tests: do not clobber the modified CC > > If CC is originally a losing compiler, AM_PROG_CC_C_O will > modify CC. "$MAKE -e" will then clobber this modified CC > and reintroduce

Re: Alternatives for check8.test...

2012-02-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-02 20:33: > On 02/02/2012 08:16 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi! >> > Hi Peter. > >> When I run the testsuite with CC="cl -nologo" in the environment, >> make -e in check8.test clobbers the rewritten CC (AM_PROG_CC_C_O >> rewrites CC, remember?) causing the test to fai

Re: Alternatives for check8.test...

2012-02-02 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 02/02/2012 08:16 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi! > Hi Peter. > When I run the testsuite with CC="cl -nologo" in the environment, > make -e in check8.test clobbers the rewritten CC (AM_PROG_CC_C_O > rewrites CC, remember?) causing the test to fail. > > I have two alternativ patches for this, one th

Re: Alternatives for check8.test...

2012-02-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-02 20:33: > On 02/02/2012 08:16 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi! >> > Hi Peter. > >> When I run the testsuite with CC="cl -nologo" in the environment, >> make -e in check8.test clobbers the rewritten CC (AM_PROG_CC_C_O >> rewrites CC, remember?) causing the test to fai

Alternatives for check8.test...

2012-02-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! When I run the testsuite with CC="cl -nologo" in the environment, make -e in check8.test clobbers the rewritten CC (AM_PROG_CC_C_O rewrites CC, remember?) causing the test to fail. I have two alternativ patches for this, one that makes the test skip in this situation and one that makes it pas