Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-29 19:35:
> Hi Peter, thanks for the patch.
>
> On 02/29/2012 01:02 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> These below tests were left mostly as-is when AM_PROG_AR was
>> introduced (with libobj16b being the exception, that test was
>> forgotten or has regressed since), in a mis
Hi Peter, thanks for the patch.
On 02/29/2012 01:02 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> These below tests were left mostly as-is when AM_PROG_AR was
> introduced (with libobj16b being the exception, that test was
> forgotten or has regressed since), in a misguided attempt to
> not make them diverge from the
These below tests were left mostly as-is when AM_PROG_AR was
introduced (with libobj16b being the exception, that test was
forgotten or has regressed since), in a misguided attempt to
not make them diverge from the original problem reports.
Modernize them so that they do not FAIL when AR=lib.
* t
