Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-29 19:35: > Hi Peter, thanks for the patch. > > On 02/29/2012 01:02 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> These below tests were left mostly as-is when AM_PROG_AR was >> introduced (with libobj16b being the exception, that test was >> forgotten or has regressed since), in a misguided attempt to >> not make them diverge from the original problem reports. >> >> Modernize them so that they do not FAIL when AR=lib. >> > Here I'd use "when $AR is Microsoft 'lib'" rather than "when AR=lib", > as the former seems a little clearer to me... Anyway, ACK either with > or without this adjustment (whatever you see more fit).
I pushed this one and the other one with the bike shedding taken care of. Thanks for looking! Cheers, Peter
