> At this point, it's probably better to drop automake-patches from
> cc when tracking the progress of coming to an agreement with the
> FSF on what forms a valid company disclaimer.
>
Agreed. You (Jeff and Dave) can ping us again once the legal issues have
been sorted out.
Thanks,
Stefano
On 02/29/2012 10:59 AM, Daily, Jeff A wrote:
>> I'm attaching the 'request-disclaim.changes' file, that should explain you
>> how
>> to contact the FSF in order to put such disclaimer properly in place (legally
>> speaking). I hope the directions given there are clear enough; if not, feel
>> free
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Lattarini [mailto:stefano.lattar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 9:48 AM
> To: Daily, Jeff A
> Cc: Dave Goodell; automake-patches@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: bug#8880: [PATCH] add pgcc support to depcomp
>
> [Droppi
On 02/27/2012 11:01 PM, Dave Goodell wrote:
> "yacc-dist-nobuild.dir" fails without this depcomp patch, but it passes with
> it. I didn't fully grok this test, but it looks like the test requires
> dependency support from the compiler+depcomp to operate correctly.
>
Not really, that was a redundan
[Dropping bug-automake]
Hi Jeff, Dave.
On 02/28/2012 12:44 AM, Daily, Jeff A wrote:
>>> we'll need a proper disclaimer from *all* the people who have written
>>> this code before incorporating it in the automake repository. So I ask:
>>>
>>> Would you and the other people that have written this
> > we'll need a proper disclaimer from *all* the people who have written
> > this code before incorporating it in the automake repository. So I ask:
> >
> > Would you and the other people that have written this code be willing
> > to assign the copyright to the Free Software Foundation, so that
Portland Group C Compiler support based on a code from Jeff Daily @ PNNL
via the automake list and automake bug #8880:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8880
---
lib/depcomp | 73 +++
1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 0 deletio
On Feb 25, 2012, at 3:08 AM CST, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 02/25/2012 03:22 AM, Dave Goodell wrote:
>> Portland Group C Compiler support based on a code from Jeff Daily @ PNNL
>> via the automake list and automake bug #8880:
>>
> By a very cursory look, this patch seems safe and unobtrusive (
Hi Dave, Jeff. Thanks for the patch!
On 02/25/2012 03:22 AM, Dave Goodell wrote:
> Portland Group C Compiler support based on a code from Jeff Daily @ PNNL
> via the automake list and automake bug #8880:
>
By a very cursory look, this patch seems safe and unobtrusive (it shouldn't
influence the
