Re: ensure that generated files are read-only

2006-09-08 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> [ adding automake-patches ] >> >> * Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 04:56:02PM CEST: >> >>>Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>>Ralf Wi

Re: ensure that generated files are read-only

2006-09-07 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ adding automake-patches ] > > * Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 04:56:02PM CEST: >> Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> > >> >> The fix is to

Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?

2006-01-30 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Simon, > > * Simon Josefsson wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:40:56AM CET: >> >> I wonder what the best idiom for gnulib should be. We probably do not >> want to require automake CVS just yet. Should it be the on

Re: $(EXEEXT) in TESTS required?

2006-01-30 Thread Simon Josefsson
do selftests = test-gc$(EXEEXT) TESTS += $(selftests) check_PROGRAMS += $(selftests) Opinions? I haven't tested that the latter works, but based on what you write, I assume it does. Once we require the next automake release, the $(EXEEXT) could be removed. > Append $(EXEEXT) to pr