Ben Pfaff writes:
> +2010-02-27 Ben Pfaff
> +
> + Make -Idir a warning instead of a fatal error if 'dir' does not
> + exist.
> + * aclocal.in (scan_m4_dirs): Demote fatal error to warning.
> +
I was hoping for some feedback on this propose
f --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 5fbc889..d0d8ccf 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2010-02-27 Ben Pfaff
+
+ Make -Idir a warning instead of a fatal error if 'dir' does not
+ exist.
+ * aclocal.in (scan_m4_dirs): Demote fatal error to warning.
+
Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> * Ben Pfaff wrote on Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:33:14PM CEST:
>> As an alternative, could Automake provide an API that allows
>> users to say "if feature X is supported, then expand this
>> configure.ac code"? For example:
>>
[AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign])])
This seems to me more in keeping with the Autoconf philosophy.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> Does cscope offer enough additional functionality over, say,
> Exuberant Ctags or gtags, to warrant being supported? Do many people
> use it?
The most useful feature of cscope that is not in *tags (as far as
I know) is that it maintains a list of source code locations
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This was one feature that prompted the
> writing of check.mk: very very often for batch-programs you write a
> test driver which takes a test file which contains things like an
> input, expected stdout, stderr, and exit status. Then testing the
> progra
r branch. The git manual
> describes this in the "creating the perfect patch series"
> chapter.
This works just fine, of course. Recently, I discovered the
fairly new command "git rebase --interactive", which can
sometimes be even easier. You might check it out, if yo
y similar
feature, such as the one you're proposing, should take into
consideration.
--
Ben Pfaff
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://benpfaff.org
Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I though it's a problem of present vs. past tense, not actove/passive voice.
>
> The changelog informs about what _was done_ so there is no reason to use
> present tense or imperative.
I've always had trouble figuring out whether past or present
tense is
